A team of agents researches against live sources, writes in your voice and queues each piece for a person to approve. Nothing goes out unseen. The same engine runs the TechDevs website.
Brief: buyers compare both side by side. Honest trade-offs, 3 live sources.
Facts match live sources
Reads in your voice
Internal links and schema in
Editor signs off
Publish to /blog/vs-market-leaderDraft
Illustration · yourbrand.com and the topics are placeholders
Brands we grow, from Mumbai to Dubai to Atlanta to Sydney
Why content stalls
Content programmes do not die of bad writing. They die in the handoffs.
Research in one tab, briefs in a doc, drafts in another tool, publishing in a CMS. For this website that was about forty hours a month to ship four articles.
01
Every article is a project
Four articles a month is all the coordination allows, while the topic list you actually need runs to hundreds.
02
Fast output reads generic
Pointing a model at a keyword produces a page nobody asked for. Without live research and your voice, volume just makes more of the same.
03
Unreviewed publishing is a risk
Fully autonomous publishing is how brands end up apologising in public. Volume is only safe with a person holding the publish button.
What we do
Five stages. One person holding the button.
The engine is a pipeline, not a prompt. Each stage has one job, and the review gate sits where the editorial decision belongs: with you.
Research and strategy
A brief built from live sources
The research agent pulls current SERPs, People-Also-Ask, Reddit questions and competitor gaps at the moment of writing. The strategy agent clusters keywords by intent and picks the angle that can win the query.
Live SERPs, not a model’s training data
Keywords clustered by intent
An angle chosen before a word is drafted
Brief · built from live sourcesStrategy agent
Target queryyourbrand vs the market leader
IntentComparing two options before a demo
Angle that can winHonest trade-offs, a comparison table
Questions to answer6 from People-Also-Ask and Reddit
Gaps in the top resultsNo pricing detail, no setup time
Illustration · placeholder topic
Brand voice
Your tone, learned from your best work
The voice profile is built from your existing best-performing pieces rather than a list of brand adjectives. The pilot batch corrects it against real articles before full production starts.
You get
Voice profile from real articles
Internal links and schema baked into every draft
A pilot batch judged on real output
Review gate
A human approves, edits or rejects
Nothing publishes itself. A person works through every draft, and that gate is what makes the volume safe. The thirty-five minutes left per article is judgement, not assembly.
Approve, edit or reject on every piece
Facts checked against the sources in the brief
No autonomous publishing, by design
content-engine · run #418
Research agentLive SERPs, Reddit questions, competitor gaps
Strategy agentPicks the angle that can win the query
Writing agentDrafts in your tone with links and schema
Review gateYou approve or edit. Nothing ships unseen.
PublishLive URL, meta, sitemap, IndexNow
One-click publish
Live URL, with the details handled
Approved drafts go straight to your live site with meta tags, OG image, schema and sitemap ping handled. Published pieces then re-enter the queue for refresh as rankings and AI citations move.
Wired into the CMS you already use
One click from approved draft to live URL
Refresh cycles on published pieces
Publish · approved by an editorPublishing
Meta title and description
Open Graph image
Schema markup
Internal links
Sitemap ping
Illustration · handled in the same click
Want to see the engine write your first article?
Two minutes of questions, then pick a time · 30 minutes with a founder · You keep the plan either way
From first call to full cadence in about three months.
1
Weeks 1–2
Voice and baseline
Voice profile, topic clustering and the hours-per-article baseline. Nothing is generated yet.
2
Weeks 3–5
Pipeline built
Wired to your CMS. First drafts appear for judgement rather than for publication.
3
Week 6
Pilot batch
A batch produced end to end. This is where the voice profile gets its real corrections.
4
Months 2–3
Full cadence
Human time per article settles at roughly thirty-five minutes, against about ten hours before.
5
Ongoing
Tune and refresh
Model providers change behaviour without notice, so an engine left untouched drifts.
Proof · Deployed on this very website
About 35 minutes of human time per article, down from about ten hours.
Content programmes die in the handoffs: forty hours of coordination a month for four articles. The engine took the assembly out, kept a human at the gate, and the same team shipped sixteen times more.
human time per published article, down from ~10 hours
~35 min
more content shipped per month, same team
16×
from approved draft to live URL
1 click
Fit
Built for some teams. Not for every team.
A strong fit if
Your content programme has stalled on coordination rather than on ideas.
You publish far less than your topic universe supports, because each article is a project.
You need volume and cannot accept generic output, so a review gate suits you.
You want to see the system running on a real site before you buy it. It runs this one.
Probably not a fit if
You want content published with no human review at all. We do not build that.
Every claim needs legal sign-off, so the gate becomes the bottleneck again.
You have only a handful of articles a month to produce. The build will not clear the hours saved.
You have no defined tone and no existing content for a voice profile to learn from.
Client love
Clients who got their voice published at volume.
4.9Average client rating
“01 / 03
Their team was very helpful, proactive, and clearly good at what they do. They also helped us rank a lot higher than our competition on search engines like Google.
Anmay ShahlotFounder · Atovio
“A colleague recommended Prithvi for our landing page design, and it was the best decision we made. Within a month, we saw a 40% increase in conversions.”
SSujal MehtaLocal Guide · Google review
“I’ve worked with Prithvi and his team at Tech Devs multiple times, and every single experience has been exceptional… once it starts showing results, the visibility and impact are incredible.”
SSamelip ShahLocal Guide · Google review
“One of the most helpful guys I’ve met when it comes to seo. They’re well equipped, and have proven strategies for fintech.”
SSiddharth ThakkarGoogle review
“Got my website done from tech devs. They were swift and finished it before time. Very humble courteous team with great knowledge for problem solving.”
MManoj BodhwaniGoogle review
“Love the energy and honest recommendations. Also the work got completed on time. Thank you thank you thank you!!!!”
RRima RohraGoogle review
“Great SEO services! Highly Recommend!!”
DDevika MandyaniGoogle review
“A colleague recommended Prithvi for our landing page design, and it was the best decision we made. Within a month, we saw a 40% increase in conversions.”
SSujal MehtaLocal Guide · Google review
“I’ve worked with Prithvi and his team at Tech Devs multiple times, and every single experience has been exceptional… once it starts showing results, the visibility and impact are incredible.”
SSamelip ShahLocal Guide · Google review
“One of the most helpful guys I’ve met when it comes to seo. They’re well equipped, and have proven strategies for fintech.”
SSiddharth ThakkarGoogle review
“Got my website done from tech devs. They were swift and finished it before time. Very humble courteous team with great knowledge for problem solving.”
MManoj BodhwaniGoogle review
“Love the energy and honest recommendations. Also the work got completed on time. Thank you thank you thank you!!!!”
RRima RohraGoogle review
“Great SEO services! Highly Recommend!!”
DDevika MandyaniGoogle review
FAQ
Questions buyers ask us first.
What is AI content automation?
AI content automation is a system of AI agents that carries an article from topic to published page with minimal manual effort. In our content engine a research agent gathers SERP and audience data, a strategy agent picks the winning angle, a writing agent drafts in your tone with internal links and schema, a human approves at a review gate, and a publish step pushes it live with meta tags, OG images, and a sitemap ping. It cuts human time per article from about ten hours to about thirty-five minutes.
Does a human still review the content before it publishes?
Always. The pipeline has a mandatory review gate: a person approves or edits every draft, and nothing publishes itself without sign-off. AI does the research, strategy, and drafting; the editorial decision stays with you.
Will AI-written content hurt my SEO?
Not when it is built for extraction and reviewed by a human. The writing agent bakes in internal links, schema markup, and your site’s tone, and every piece passes a human gate before it goes live. The same engine runs the TechDevs website, where it ships 16× more content per month with the same team.
Can it publish straight to my CMS?
Yes. Approved drafts go straight to the live site in one click, with meta tags, OG images, and the sitemap ping all handled. We integrate the publish step with the CMS you already use.
How much does an AI content engine cost?
It is priced as a build plus a running fee: a one-time cost to design, train and ship the pipeline, then a smaller ongoing fee to operate and tune it. The build cost is driven by how many tools it connects and the volume it has to process. We scope it on a first call and give you a real range.
Will AI-written content rank in Google?
Google judges content on whether it is useful, not on how it was produced, and its guidance is explicit that AI assistance is not itself a problem. What gets penalised is thin, unhelpful output produced at scale — which is why our pipeline includes a research stage against live sources and a human review gate before anything publishes. Volume without judgement is the failure mode, not the tooling.
Does the content actually sound like our brand?
The writing agent works from a tone profile built out of your existing best-performing pieces rather than from a list of brand adjectives, which is what usually produces generic output. The pilot batch exists specifically so that profile gets corrected against real articles before full production starts. A human still edits at the gate.
How much human time does each article still take?
On this website it settled at roughly thirty-five minutes per published article, down from about ten hours. That remaining time is judgement — approving the angle, correcting facts, editing tone — rather than assembly work. The same team then shipped around sixteen times more content per month.
Can I see the system working before I buy it?
Yes. This exact engine publishes the TechDevs website, so the output you are reading is the product. On a call we will walk through the pipeline on live data rather than through a recorded demo.
Does anything publish without a human seeing it?
No. The pipeline ends at a review gate where a person approves, edits or rejects, and publishing is a click that a human takes. Fully autonomous publishing is where these systems fail publicly, and we do not build it that way regardless of how much faster it would be.
Who leads this
Run by the engineer, not handed to a junior.
Co-founder · CTO, AI & operations
Prasad Iyer
Runs engineering and the AI division. Builds the systems the marketing runs on: multi-agent content pipelines, outbound booking agents and operations dashboards.
